Provincial Utility Saskatchewan Demonstrator Case · Illustrative

Provincial Utility, Saskatchewan

Electric service vehicles for field and line crews — credits that still clear on Canada’s highest-CI provincial grid.

SK GRID · CI 218 DC EV VAN LINE TRK
Fleet Scale
~50 electric units
Est. Credits / Year
~350 t
Est. Revenue / Year
~CAD 140K
The Initiative

Credits that still clear on Canada’s hardest-CI grid.

Saskatchewan’s grid CI (~218 gCO2e/MJ, per ECCC Specifications for Fuel LCA Model CI Calculations v4.0, Table 12) is the highest in Canada — a deliberate stress test of the CFR Part 3 math. Even on the SK grid, an EER-corrected reference CI (~84–87 × 4.1–5.0) still sits well above the grid, so every MJ of depot-dispensed electricity booked against the registered low-CI electricity pathway still generates a positive credit. The yield per kWh is thinner than in BC or QC, but it’s real, it’s bankable, and it accrues every month without the utility lifting a finger on the compliance side.

The Fleet

Electrified units powering the credit stream.

40 units
Light Electric Service Vans

Field-services, meter-reading, and customer-site crews — standard light-duty vans, dispatched from depot charging hubs each morning.

4,000 kWh/yr each Light-duty vehicle · EER 4.1
10 units
Electric Utility & Line Trucks

Purpose-built electric utility trucks with bucket booms for line-repair and overhead-infrastructure crews — higher energy draw per vehicle, regional coverage.

35,000 kWh/yr each Medium-duty bus class · EER 5.0
Total annual charging energy: 510,000 kWh/yr (1,836,000 MJ/yr) — depot-charged on the SK grid at CI ~218 gCO2e/MJ (ECCC Specifications for Fuel LCA Model CI Calculations v4.0, Table 12), the basis for the CFR credit projection below. Run it yourself in the calculator →
Revenue

What the utility receives each year.

At current CFR pricing (~$400 / credit), ~40 light service vans plus ~10 electric line trucks in Saskatchewan — charged on the SK grid (~218 gCO2e/MJ, ECCC Fuel LCA Model v4.0 Table 12) — generate on the order of ~350 tCO2e / year of CFR credits, around CAD 140,000 in annual credit revenue, paid to the utility after each annual cycle. Climate Decode retains only a small management fee.

Year-1 Credit Revenue (Est.)
~CAD 140K
Paid to the utility after a small management fee. Climate Decode fronts verifier costs and runs the MRV — no cash out-of-pocket. Four-year cumulative revenue: ~CAD 533K (CI stringency tightens yield each year — especially on a high-CI grid).
4-Year Financial Projection

Credit revenue across the first compliance cycle.

Projection pulled directly from the site CFR calculator — CFR reference CIs (ECCC Specifications for Fuel LCA Model CI Calculations v4.0, Schedule 1 & 6), EER per ECCC Schedule 5, SK grid CI per ECCC Fuel LCA Model v4.0 Table 12 (~218 gCO2e/MJ), and credit pricing at current market (~CAD 400 / credit).

Year 2025
$139.9K
~350 t credits
Year 2026
$135.4K
~339 t credits
Year 2027
$130.9K
~327 t credits
Year 2028
$126.4K
~316 t credits
4-Year Cumulative Revenue
~CAD 533K
Total Credits
~1,332 t

Annual credit volume drifts down steadily year-over-year as the CFR reference CI tightens under the declining trajectory — a high-CI grid amplifies that drift; revenue averages ~CAD 133K/yr across the cycle.

Where ZEV Catalyst Comes In

The work the utility would otherwise have to build a compliance team to do.

ZEV Catalyst builds the CFR methodology around the depot-charging meters, registers the utility as a Part 3 credit creator, runs the MRV for every kWh dispensed at the SK grid CI, and manages annual third-party verification with ECCC. The utility signs one agreement, deals with one counterparty, never sees a verifier invoice — and collects a credit stream that would otherwise be left on the table on one of Canada’s hardest grids for CFR math.

Running a Similar Fleet? Let’s Run the Numbers for You.

Every operator is different — your utilisation, electricity mix, jurisdiction, and equipment class drive the outcome. Talk to our team and we’ll model what the ZEV Catalyst programme would actually pay you.

This case is illustrative, based on CFR methodology and current market pricing (~$400 / credit). Actual revenue depends on fleet utilisation, electricity source, jurisdiction, verification outcomes, and market conditions.